1. I can admit I’m a sinner, and I can realize that a Holy God would demand recompense. I can even say I could not do anything to get myself into the presence of Absolute Goodness. I could easily say after my physical death there’s no good reason for my essence to continue on or for my body to return. For those reasons, I could easily say I need a Savior.
2. I can also say lectures, debates, books, and research from psychologists, neuroscientists, historians, and other thinkers seem to offer better explanations of human problems than the available Christian explanations, and better explanations of why Christianity captivates people.
Postscript: Oddly enough, when Christians hold up their hands at available information (see Sources section below) and refuse to wrestle with it, that refusal plays into the theories of social psychologists — in two ways. First, “social proof,” or the testimonies and beliefs of the people one knows, tends to weigh more heavily in decision-making than evidence-and-reason. Second, as research suggests, when confronted with strong reasons for an opposing point of view, people tend to redouble their dedication to their original point of view.
Valerie Tarico cites Flo Conway and Jim Siegelman in her video series; here are two quotations from them:
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini
Prophetic Charisma: The Psychology of Revolutionary Religious Personalities by Len Oakes
Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomena by Daniel Dennett
Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength by Roy F. Baumeister and John Tierney
Psychologist Valerie Tarico’s video series, Christianity and Cognitive Science
Michael Shermer’s news feature on religious experiences and the brain, Out of the Body Experiment
Andy Thomson’s lecture, Why We Believe in Gods
Jill Bolte Taylor’s TED talk here.