OK, I’m bored, and I need a break from grading, so I’ll take the bait.
I’ve wondered about the motivation within the person who occasionally finds it meaningful to jump on my blog here and give one-star votes to everything on the first page of posts, regardless of extremely wide differences in the content of each. It has happened before, and this week, happened again.
These disapproving votes first appeared shortly after I added a link to a reputable charity seeking to help Syrian refugees, who through no fault of their own have been forced from their homes with their children. So I suspect the voter dislikes Syrians or Muslims. I wish it bothered me more, but that sort of dislike has become cliché.
However, for me, at the moment, the motivation behind the one-star votes is not the real question.
The real question is why, after voting one star on six posts on my homepage, did the voter fail to click that single left-hand star on the final post?
The homepage, the landing page, always displays seven posts. Until the post you’re reading right now was published, the seventh post on this page stood without a vote. It was right there, barely a mouse-twitch away. I assure you that post is just as hostile as the six previous posts to everything the voter stands for. Now it’s gone over to the second page, out of reach to quick protest votes.
One star is better than nothing. Thank you.
So, I took the bait. You’re welcome. Thanks for the break from grading.